paleface Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So Lilly Rose, are you now stating that any post
> here on the Rick Ross forum is not "credible"
> unless the person making the post completly
> identifies themself and provides scriptural
> references to back their statements?
>
> I do not recall that being a requirement of this
> forum. As ex-cult members, yes are posts will
> sound biased and yes, most of them will sound
> critical of the LW leadership. This is because
> most of us received significant harm by the LW.
_____________________________________________
PF- You have twisted my comment. In response to your first paragraph question, no I didn't state that for a post to be credible one has to self identify and cite a scripture. To be clear I am repeating that, no I didn't state that for a post to be credible one has to self identify and cite a scripture. I stated why I thought Mike Sthuler was credible. Again, to be clear, I stated why I though Mike Sthuler was credible.
Regarding your second paragraph, I know that there is no requirement to self identify on this forum and I don't recommend it. I think for some folks to speak out, they need a screen name. When folks post their stories about the harm they received they have every right to be critical of the treatment and their stories speak volumes about deficiencies in the leadership.
Sorry PF. I wasn't trying to push anyone's buttons.
-------------------------------------------------------
> So Lilly Rose, are you now stating that any post
> here on the Rick Ross forum is not "credible"
> unless the person making the post completly
> identifies themself and provides scriptural
> references to back their statements?
>
> I do not recall that being a requirement of this
> forum. As ex-cult members, yes are posts will
> sound biased and yes, most of them will sound
> critical of the LW leadership. This is because
> most of us received significant harm by the LW.
_____________________________________________
PF- You have twisted my comment. In response to your first paragraph question, no I didn't state that for a post to be credible one has to self identify and cite a scripture. To be clear I am repeating that, no I didn't state that for a post to be credible one has to self identify and cite a scripture. I stated why I thought Mike Sthuler was credible. Again, to be clear, I stated why I though Mike Sthuler was credible.
Regarding your second paragraph, I know that there is no requirement to self identify on this forum and I don't recommend it. I think for some folks to speak out, they need a screen name. When folks post their stories about the harm they received they have every right to be critical of the treatment and their stories speak volumes about deficiencies in the leadership.
Sorry PF. I wasn't trying to push anyone's buttons.